a house divided
On Tuesday morning a group of 20 production companies sent a letter to Matt Miller, President of the AICP, and the Members of the Executive Board. The letter requested an open meeting to address their dissatisfaction with the leadership of the AICP. The issues range from labor negotiations and CEO accountability to membership dues and legal council. The group of 20 include many of the top houses in the industry. Epoch can be counted among them.
When approached about placing Epoch's name on this list I was hesitant. It demanded immediate action and fundamental change in the AICP. It was a serious statement to be associated with. I discussed it with my partners. We did not take Epoch's participation lightly.
When weighing the decision, I read the letter a few times. There were things I agreed with. Things I did not. I wasn't sure if this was the right message. The right method. Or the right timing. Hopefully, at a later date, the AICP and the members of this group will allow me to post the letter for all to read.
Despite my misgivings one thing superceded all my trepidations. Twenty fierce competitors finally agreed on something. This group was committed to tackling issues facing our industry and it was starting with our own institution. Resolving our own internal differences in an open forum is a step in the right direction. These reasons alone were enough to sign on. So we did. What is unfortunate is unity may be coming at the expense of Matt Miller and the current Executive Board.
Those familiar with my blog know I have been publicly critical of the AICP agenda, leadership and communication. My critique was rooted in the desire to spark dialogue and debate. I may have disagreed with AICP policies and priorities but I never doubted their motives and commitment, in particular Matt and the board members who donate their time to the cause. This dedication and past contribution should never be questioned. But, it is all our responsibility to the crew, vendors, employees, directors, and everyone whos livleyhood is dependent upon our business to explore every possible solution in securing the future of our industry.
Whatever differences these factions may have, I believe everyone can agree that a strong and focused AICP is crucial to the long term health of our businesses. The acceptance of this is the first step toward creating lasting and productive unity. The best way to achieve this is through pragmatic debate conducted with respect and civility.
Within the next couple of weeks the signees of the letter and the AICP leadership will schedule a meeting to discuss our differences. It is my sincere hope and belief that from these conversations will emerge a more powerful and unified association.
As we work towards this summit, I will continue to up date and share my thoughts on these very important conversations.
Jerry Solomon is the managing partner of
Comments